| |
About
CAC
Sign-up
for Center's free E-Newsletter
Democracy
Workshops
Internships/Volunteers
Annual
Report
Citizen
Initiative Awards
Newsletter
Contact
Us
Awards
Directions
to the Center
|
-
SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
HEARING
- APRIL 10, 2002
- Testimony of Terry Pastika, Executive Director and Community
Lawyer Citizen Advocacy Center
-
- Good morning Senator Parker and committee members. Thank you for convening
this hearing and providing an opportunity to address you. My name is
Terry Pastika and I am the Executive Director and a Community Lawyer
with the Citizen Advocacy Center in Elmhurst, Illinois. The Center is
a non-profit, non-partisan legal organization dedicated to building
democracy in the western suburbs by strengthening the citizenry's capacities,
resources and institutions for self-governance.
-
- I am testifying on behalf of the Tollway Accountability Campaign,
or TAC. TAC is a coalition of twenty-five regional and statewide civic,
community and environmental groups that have joined together to seek
increased fiscal accountability and legislative oversight of the Toll
Highway Authority. We are here to address the 87% proposed toll increase
put forth by Toll Authority.
-
- The Citizen Advocacy Center has followed the history of fiscal mismanagement
of the Toll Authority and published our findings through the beginning
of 1999 in Tollgate I and Tollgate II. A brief highlight of past financial
indiscretions indicates an agency ripe for reform:
- A lavish $25.5 million new headquarters with $4.5 million in fixtures
and 30 board room chairs valued at $1,700 each;
- The conviction of a former executive director on charges of conspiracy,
theft, and official misconduct based on the misuse of $240,000 in tollway
funds in connection with a land deal;
- The theft of $182,000 from the counting room at the Toll Authority;
- Despite knowledge for the last 40 years that the original tollroads
would have to be rebuilt, no implementation of financial management
plans.
- The current Toll Authority representatives assert that these are indiscretions
of the past and many of the problems have been addressed. Despite verbal
assurances, no guarantees exist to bind the Toll Authority from unaccountable
practices. The integrity of the Toll Authority needs to come from protections
built into the system rather than based on directors who come and go.
-
- After years of questionable financial practices, the Toll Authority
is in a self-proclaimed financial crisis. The proposed solution is a
toll increase to fund a $5.5 billion system-wide reconstruction and
widening project that is part of a 15 year Capitol Plan. Although this
would be one of the largest public works projects in the history of
Illinois, the proposed need for $5.5 billion is put forth without any
stated basis, studies, reports, options, or alternatives to the reconstruction
and widening projects. Most of the $5.5 billion is allocated to road
widening in order to solve congestion problems, a solution that supposes
not be a single additional car in 15 years will drive on the tollroads
where extra lanes are built. We know from our history in this region
that when more lanes are built, more cars appear. It is beyond reason
to think that the Toll Authority can come forward and state that they
need $5.5 billion, trust them to determine the need for it, how to spend
it and the precise work program that will be used after a long history
of fiscal mismanagement.
-
- The manner in which the Toll Authority has proposed the toll increase
is another indicator for the need for accountability. By statute, the
Toll Authority is required to hold public hearings in all counties that
the toll roads serve. The public hearing is supposed to be an opportunity
for decision makers to hear input from the public, and for the public
to hear proposed actions, considered alternatives and policy justifications
for the actions under consideration. The Capitol Plan is one of the
largest public works projects in the history of Illinois and the Toll
Authority chose to conduct all twelve public hearings on the same evening
and at time, April 17, 2002 between 7-9 PM. There has been no indication
that any directors will in-fact attend any of the pubic hearings, only
that senior staffers will attend. By conducting the public hearings
simultaneously and by not committing to directors being present at the
hearings, the public does not have an adequate opportunity to have a
dialogue with the individuals who are responsible for the toll hike
- the directors.
-
- Considering the significant size of the public works project, the
dire financial status of the Toll Authority and the inadequacy of the
public hearings, serious questions linger regarding the toll increase
and the Capitol Plan proposed:
- What is the basis for the estimated costs for all the projects proposed
under the Capitol Plan, what studies were conducted and by whom?
- The proposed Capitol Plan is a 15 year project but only pays for the
next eight years, what is the exact cost for the full 15 years and how
much will tolls have to be increased overall to pay?
- Given the enormous scope of the Capitol Plan, how does the public
know that the Toll Authority has the capacity to manage the project?
- Toll Authority representatives have alluded that the proposed toll
increase would only be used to fund the reconstruction and widening
of the existing system. With the current toll roads on the brink of
crumbling, considerations of any plans to build new tollroads is outrageous.
Motorists deserve a detailed account and schedule of budgetary expenditures
and the Toll Authority should commit to a moratorium on new tollway
construction until all reconstruction and repairs have been completed.
-
- The only way motorists can be assured that any expenditures of the
toll authority will not be recklessly spent is through General Assembly
oversight of the Toll Authority budget with major capital expenditures,
bond issuance, or toll increases subject to legislative review. Riders
of the Illinois tollways deserve assured accountability from an agency
that, despite numerous years of revenue surplus, has carelessly failed
to plan for basic and obvious future costs.
-
- Thank you for your time.
|